Australia made global headlines last month when it became the first country to ban under-16s from creating accounts on major social media platforms. The goal? To protect young people’s mental health and reduce exposure to harmful content.

So, what’s happened so far?

✅ Compliance Efforts
Platforms like Meta, TikTok, and Snapchat have rolled out stricter age checks, including ID verification and facial analysis. The law requires them to report monthly on how many under-16 accounts they have removed. The eSafety Commissioner is monitoring compliance, issuing fines of up to A$50 million for breaches.

⚠ Challenges and Loopholes
Despite the crackdown, reports suggest some teens are finding ways around the ban—using VPNs, borrowed IDs, or tricks to fool facial recognition. This raises questions about how effective enforcement can be without universal age-verification standards.

🗣 Mixed Reactions
Supporters say the law is a vital step for safeguarding mental health. Critics warn it could isolate teens from their peers or push them toward less-regulated platforms, with vulnerable teens who rely on online communities being disproportionately affected. Legal challenges are already underway, with Reddit and two teenagers contesting the ban in Australia’s High Court.

🌍 Global Watch – Could the UK Be Next?
Australia’s move is being closely monitored worldwide:

  • France’s President Emmanuel Macron has publicly expressed support for similar restrictions.

  • The Philippines is actively debating whether to follow Australia’s lead, citing concerns about hyper‑connected youth culture.

  • The US now has several states pursuing under‑16 or under‑18 social media bans, inspired in part by Australia’s approach.

  • Analysts suggest Australia may remain an outlier, with many governments hesitant to adopt such sweeping restrictions.

What do you think?
The UK’s Online Safety Act already places heavy obligations on platforms to protect children, but it stops short of an outright ban.

With Australia’s experiment still unfolding — and early signs showing both progress and significant friction — UK policymakers may watch rather than rush. The key question is whether a ban would genuinely protect young people or simply push risks elsewhere.

back to Articles